Category: Christianity

  • Christian Carnival

    Welcome to the Christian Carnival for July 27, 2011. We have a number of interesting posts and I will doubtless yield to the temptation to add my own commentary, thus demonstrating that there are some certainties in life. I will also invent any number of awards and bestow them on various posts.

    Culture

    Aoide-Melete-Mneme(my error corrected-HN) Jennifer Vaughn presents A Lament for Chivalry posted at à la mode de les Muses. She tells us that chivalry is dead, but second-wave feminism didn’t kill it. Who’s to blame? Many of us, it would seem.

    Bible Study

    Jeremy Pierce dips into one of my favorite subjects, translation theory, as he presents Formal Translation in Aquinas posted at Parableman, a look at a translation issue in Aquinas to shed light on one factor in the Bible translation debates. Jeremy proposes alternate translations, and they are well worth noting. I’ve starred this one for a comment post of my own, so I won’t discuss it here.

    Apologetics

    Maryann Spikes presents Can Richard Dawkins Handle Propositions? posted at YouTube, saying, “For those unfamiliar w/ the backstory: Dr. Dawkins is afraid to debate Dr. Craig, and just got in trouble for calling a feminist a whiner for blogging against being propositioned in an elevator. There are ‘those’ sorts of propositions, then there are propositions in logical arguments. Hence–the title. :-D” OK – first time I’ve included a YouTube video in a carnival that wasn’t embedded in someone’s post, but hey, it’s the social media age! This gets the “doing a new thing” award.

    Luke Nix presents Can Religion Be Tested for Truth? posted at Faithful Thinkers, thus heading into some of the deepest waters in Christian apologetics. I want a lot more definitions, but this will start a good discussion, hopefully between people who do think propositions can be true and false!

    Edgar Andrews presents God, science and evolution Part 1 posted at Who Made God?. This post connects to the previous one in that both are dealing with epistemology, with how we know things. Words like “reality,” “testing,” and “humanistic methodology.” Few seem to have patience to work through these issues, but they will continue to bedevil you whether you acknowledge them or not.

    Stephen McAndrew presents Finale? posted at Songs of a Semi-Free Man, saying, “This post exams the tension between our quest for meaning and our physical death – an existentialist apologetic. This is the latest essay post on my blog ‘Songs of a Semi-Free Man’, which focuses on dismantling post-modern and modernist myths through essays and poetry.” This presents a very different approach to asking about reality, and yet it connects with the previous ones. If we sense an emptiness, is there something missing?

    J.W. Wartick presents Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, A Christian’s thoughts posted at J.W. Wartick -“Always Have a Reason”,  a commentary on the Harry Potter phenomenon from a Christian perspective. A focus on incorporating Potter to teach about Jesus. OK, I confess that I have neither read any of the books nor seen any of the movies, nor bothered to listen to much commentary. In this post I read more about Harry Potter than I have read in the entire time since the books were released. But there is a great tradition of using fiction to illustrate religious themes, and this post is a good example. It gets the “made me read about something I’d avoided” award. (And yes, I know this is a fiction blog!)

    Greg West presents The Poached Egg Apologetics – The Eagle Has Landed or Has It? posted at The Poached Egg Apologetics, in which he engages in some very pointed satire. If you don’t get where this one is going pretty quickly, I can’t help you. His little note at the end ‘splaining it is pretty much redundant.

    Chris Brooks presents Jesus & Myth posted at Homeward Bound, in which he asks, “Were the stories about Jesus borrowed from ancient myths?” It’s an interesting and brief rundown of the argument.

    Devotionals

    Lauren Shook presents In the Whirlwind and Storm is His Way posted at RE//all things new. Sometimes we see God in the events in nature, such as storms. I give this post the evocative imagery award.

    Christina Siniscalchi presents Gifts That Matter posted at Sisternotes, reminding us of the importance of gifts. I confess I wanted to know more about the poor kid in the introduction who got his note torn up!

    Jane Baker presents Spiritual and Emotional Health posted at To Drivel or Not to Drivel, saying, “I’d like to have comments on this post in advance of speaking on this topic in August.” I will add that you should read the post to see the phrase “birthing Ishmaels” used in a sentence.

    Isabel Anders presents A “Soul Moment” | BlogHer posted at BlogHer. Do you like to be able to see where you’re going? How far do you have to see? I confess that “one step at a time” is not far enough for me. This is an excerpt from the blog author’s book Soul Moments.

    Dan Lower presents Cynical Hope and the “O My Jesus” Prayer posted at keyboard theologians, in which the overwhelming hope of the Christian tradition helps to make us hopeful even in our cynicism, if nothing else, for the hope of our own salvation. I give this the “hopeful cynic” award.

    loswl presents Learning the Joy of Trusting in God posted at INSPIKS. He says: “This week the topic that has been on my heart is faith and trust. For some reason it really bothers me when people say that they can’t trust in God because of what He puts them through.” Trust is hard. ‘Nuff said? Nah. Go read the post.

    Kaleb presents God Willing? posted at W2W Soul: Windows to The Woman’s Soul, saying, “When is the last time you heard someone say ‘God willing?’ When I was a child, it was a common occurrence to include the phrase ‘God willing’ when making statements about the future.” This gets the “yeah, we really ought to do that” award.

    My wife Jody Neufeld presents (or I present on her behalf) Because I Said So from Jody’s Devotionals, dealing with one of the hard passages of scripture.

    Narratives

    Jennifer in OR presents Sister Love, Brother Bear posted at Diary of 1. This is a story of how stitch by stitch, her children’s souls were being connected in gracious love. Great story!

    Ridge Burns presents Ken Blanchard posted at Ridge’s Blog. How often do you celebrate someone who has sown new seeds into your life and ministry?

    michelle presents leaving the nest? posted at going into all the earth…, saying, “little excerpt from my life…” But it’s an excerpt that will resonate with any of us whose children have moved away. Don’t worry, Michelle, wonderful things are coming!

    Financial

    Jason Price presents The Great Recovery: Dave Ramsey’s new movement posted at One Money Design, saying, “Did you see the Great Recovery kick off event? Dave Ramsey has initiated a movement for people to manage their money better and follow God’s principles.”

    Joe Plemon presents Am I a Rich Fool? posted at Personal Finance By The Book, saying, “I sometimes read scripture through a filter which allows the truth to enter my brain while bypassing my heart. The story of the rich fool just may have been through that filter.”

    That concludes this edition. Submit your blog article to the next edition of christian carnival ii using our carnival submission form. Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival index page.

     

    Technorati tags: , .

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Christian Carnival Here Tomorrow

    The Christian Carnival is coming to Jevlir, so get your best post of the week submitted so I can include it. You can submit posts via  BlogCarnival.com, and you can get more information on the carnival on its Facebook page.

     

  • Christian Carnival Posted at Keyboard Theologians

    Check it out! Next week’s carnival will be right here at the Jevlir Caravansary.  To check the hosting schedule or for more information, check the carnival Facebook page.

  • The God-Talk Club Faces the End

    “So I guess I won’t be seeing you any more after tonight,” said Bob Norman, looking at Jerry.

    “And why would you say that?” asked Jerry, though his expression and tone indicated he wasn’t surprised.

    “May 21,” said Mac.

    “I expect May 21 will pass as many other May 21s have passed before,” said Jerry.

    “You didn’t expect to find anyone here that believes that nonsense, did you?” asked Mandy.

    Ellen chuckled. “Not likely,” she said.

    “So how am I supposed to tell the difference between one nut and another?” asked Bob, grinning to take away the sting. “Seriously, Jerry here believes any number of things I find irrational. He already knows that.” Jerry nodded. “In fact, you believe the rapture will happen soon, don’t you?”

    “Actually,” said Jerry, “I don’t believe in the rapture. I believe in a single second coming at a time nobody can predict. We are to live as though it might happen tomorrow, but we don’t know when it will happen.”

    “That’s weird,” said Bob. “I thought all Christians believed in the rapture. Do you believe Jesus might come back in your lifetime?”

    This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance between these characters and anyone in the real world is totally coincidental. Copyright © 2011, Henry E. Neufeld

    “As I said, I don’t know. I’m not supposed to know.”

    “What about the rest of you? Do you believe in the rapture?” asked Bob.

    Ellen shook her head.

    Mandy said “Not me.”

    Mac said, “I don’t count.”

    Mark said, “I’m not sure.”

    “You’re never sure,” put in Jerry.

    “I guess I’m the odd woman out, then,” said Justine.

    “So doesn’t it bother you that you’re the only one who believes that Jesus is coming back to take you off to heaven?” asked Bob.

    “No, and I think you’re missing something. Nobody said Jesus wasn’t coming back. We just disagree on the details and how last day events fit together. I believe in the rapture. I’m premillenial. Jerry, I’d guess, is amillenial. It doesn’t matter to me, as long as we believe Jesus is coming back.”

    “So if you don’t believe in the rapture, what does it mean that Jesus is coming back?” asked Bob.

    “If you’re going to call them nuts, you really should get your varieties straight,” said Mac. “And believe me, I think this end of the world stuff is nuts in almost any form. But there are Christians who believe in a second coming where everything is open and public, and everything ends at once. There are other Christians who believe that all the ‘saved’ people will be taken to heaven and others will be left behind for the tribulation time.”

    “How do you keep this stuff straight?” asked Bob, but everyone could tell it was rhetorical.

    “On the other hand there are Christians who believe that God’s kingdom simply wins and takes over in the end, like leaven working its way through dough.” Mandy could always be counted on to provide the unexpected answer.

    “I like that one,” said Mark.

    “But do you think it’s true?” asked Jerry.

    “I really don’t know,” said Mark.

    “It’s pretty complicated, as a result of the number of different Bible books that talk about it in inconsistent ways,” said Mandy.

    “I wouldn’t call it inconsistent,” said Jerry. “You just have to understand what applied to what time. Most of the prophecies applied to the immediate time frame, and then give a quick look at the final consummation right at the end.”

    “It looks pretty inconsistent to me,” said Mark.

    “I still believe in the rapture. I used to think it was obvious, but after taking a class in eschatology here at the seminary, I discovered other ways to understand the texts. So I understand why people believe different things. It’s not clear, so differences of opinion are inevitable.”

    “But isn’t this something you should get clear?” asked Bob.

    “Why?” asked Mandy.

    “Well, it seems important! It’s the end of the world, after all!”

    “But what can I do about it?”

    “Well, you could get ready, I suppose.”

    “But that’s precisely what she’s supposed to be doing anyhow,” interrupted Jerry.

    “Exactly,” said Mandy.

    “In fact, if she didn’t, that would put her sincerity in question,” said Mark.

    “So you have to get it right and be sincere about it?” asked Bob.

    “You have to be real,” said Jerry.

    “If you don’t mean it, what good is it?” asked Mandy.

    “So let me get this straight,” said Mac. “I thought Christians were saved by faith. You’re telling me you have to do things?”

    “I’d think ‘actual faith’ would be a good term. If you say ‘I believe’ and you’re lying, it’s not much good.” Mandy looked at Jerry.

    “For once I pretty much agree, though I’d expand it a bit. The reformation saying was ‘saved by faith alone, but not by a faith that is alone.’ That suggests the faith must be real and that real faith results in real actions.”

    “So if you don’t do good deeds, you won’t be saved,” said Bob.

    “There will be good fruit in your life, yes,” said Jerry.

    “So you earn your way into heaven by doing those good deeds.”

    “No, you do good deeds because God has saved you.”

    “This is another one I don’t understand. Do you all agree on this?” asked Bob.

    Everyone nodded. “I think we might disagree on a few terms, but in general, we’d all agree with that,” said Justine.

    “So the idea is that you’re supposed to live as though Jesus might come and put an end to it all at any moment,” said Bob.

    “Precisely. Because Jesus is already here with us in any case,” said Jerry.

    “So why do various groups, like Adventists, make predictions about the end times at all? It just makes you look silly,” said Bob.

    “Well, Adventists are a small group. Most Christians don’t make such predictions,” said Jerry.

    “Adventists only made the one prediction–well, really two–back in the mid 19th century. Now they don’t do that any more,” said Mandy.

    “But they still harp on this ‘soon’ thing in terms of thinking it will happen in their lifetimes or within just a few years,” said Jerry.

    “But so do many other groups of Christians,” said Mandy.

    “And that’s what I don’t get,” said Bob. “I realize it’s easy to beat up on this Camping guy for giving such a precise prediction that will certainly turn out to be false. But other haven’t there been other dates?”

    “Some people thought Jesus would return by 1988 because Israel was restored as a nation in 1948, and they thought it must happen in a generation after that, you know, ‘this generation will not pass till all these things are fulfilled.’ I can’t remember precisely where that’s from.” It was the most Mark had added to the discussion for several sessions.

    “And that’s what seems crazy to me. Constantly going back to your holy book for a new timeline when all the timelines have failed before,” said Bob.

    “Which,” said Jerry, “Is why I don’t believe we should do anything of the sort. And the passage in question is part of what Jesus said about the last days in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21. You quoted Matthew 24:34. That’s also where it says nobody knows the day or the hour (verse 36), but the 1988 folks thought they avoided that by saying that they weren’t giving a day and an hour, but only a year, and that as a deadline, not a specific year.”

    “Sounds like weasel-wording to me,” said Bob. “It seems like a pretty clear way to say you won’t know when.”

    “I agree,” said Jerry.

    “Mark it on your calendar folks,” said Ellen. “Bob and Jerry agree!”

    “I think it’s interesting that there’s all this hype about May 21, and here in a group like this I don’t find anyone that believes it,” said Bob.

    “I doubt you’d find anyone in any of the churches we attend. It’s a media circus. There are very few people who actually believe it.” Jerry didn’t even bother looking around the group, he was so sure of their agreement.

    “Absolutely,” said Mandy.

    “A couple folks in my church were disturbed enough to ask me, but as soon as I quoted a couple of the texts we’ve used here, they understood,” said Justine.

    “Well,” said Mac, “I’m going to have to be the first to leave today. I, for one, think we can continue the discussion next week!”

    “Yes,” said Bob. “Since you’re all going to be here after all, I’d like to know what you think about hell. Will God really fry sinners for all eternity, just for being wrong?”

    “I wouldn’t put it that way,” said Jerry. But the group was breaking up.

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Dying for a Bad Man

    Drooping spray of pink double roses, probably ...
    Image via Wikipedia

    “OK, Grandpa, why the h … heck are we here again?” The words were polite enough as the 17-year-old addressed his grandfather. The tone wasn’t.

    “Because you enjoy driving other people around in your car, and I’m paying for your gas.” The grandfather’s words were equally sharp and direct. It was how their relationship worked, much to the embarrassment of the boy’s parents.

    “OK, first point goes to you. But you know what I mean. I’d take you anywhere in the city and you know it. You could be looking out over the ocean. You could be in the park with green grass and trees. But you’re here in this run-down alley, messing around with those–what are they?–wanna-be roses?”

    “I am.”

    “But why?”

    “I like it here. I feel peace here. I feel life here.”

    “But why?”

    “What’s gotten into you today? You’d usually be in your car with the stereo turned up. Why do you care?”

    “It just seems strange. Every month or so you have me bring you here and you tend those roses. Why nobody has just dug them up, I don’t know. It’s just weird.”

    “You see that cross there, painted on the wall?”

    “Yeah.”

    “What does it say?”

    “It says some dude died here, 40 years ago.”

    “Thanks for the translation. Frank Baczkowski was my partner. He died right there.” He pointed to the middle of the alley.

    “You’re coming to the place where your partner died? Forty years ago?”

    “Yes.”

    “You feel peace?”

    “Yes.”

    “Life?”

    “Yes.”

    “Grandpa, we need to get you checked out. You’re going senile.”

    He chuckled. “There are worse things than dying.”

    “So he was a cop, right? Was he shot?”

    “Yes. He stepped out into the path of a bullet …”

    “Stupid!”

    “… to stop one man from shooting another.”

    “Oh. Was that you?”

    “No. I was right over there.” He pointed further down the alley. “There were some garbage cans between me and the shooter.”

    “But this Frank whatever dude, he saved someone’s life.”

    “Yes.” The old man went on tending the rose bushes.

    “Was it someone important?”

    “No, I suppose not.”

    “Was he a good person?”

    “No.”

    “Why?”

    “He ended up spending the rest of his life in jail.”

    “Sounds awful. I wouldn’t want to be here.”

    “True.”

    “OK. I can tell you’re in a mood. When you’re happy, you’re sarcastic. When you’re pissed at me, you go all quiet.”

    “Do you really want to know what happened?”

    “Yes. Yes, I think I do.”

    “It’s fairly simple. Frank and I were partners.  We were in the alley checking something out. I don’t even remember what it was. There was junk and garbage cans all over the place. Suddenly a man jumps out further down the alley and starts running, and another just appears in that end and starts shooting at him. Frank says to me, ‘I’ll distract him, you shoot him.’ I say ‘OK.’ So how does Frank distract him? He steps into the middle of the alley and he stops the next bullet. He yelled at the shooter, I assume to identify himself as a cop and to tell him to stop, but the bullet hit him before he got very far. Then I shot the bad guy. It turned out later they were rival criminals having a dispute.”

    He paused for a few moments. “There was a lot of debate about what Frank did. Some said he shouldn’t have given his life for such scum. Some said he couldn’t have known. Others said he should have found a way to stop the shooting without dying as he did it. I don’t know. There were only a few seconds. It happened. Frank was dead.”

    “But why do you find peace here?”

    “Because for all the reasons that shooting was a bad idea, it was pure Frank. He wouldn’t have cared whose life he saved. He wouldn’t have cared about the debates over how he did it. I know exactly what he would have said. He’d say, ‘It was the only way to be sure.’”

    “But at least you killed the bad guy.”

    “No, actually, I didn’t.”

    “You missed?”

    “I shot him, but he survived.”

    “What happened to him?”

    “Oh, he was executed for the murder.”

    “OK, but I still don’t see why you like this place.”

    “Frank and I had been going down hill. We were both drinking heavily, and I was neglecting my family. Your dad will remember those times. I was always at work, but sometimes when I was ‘at work’ I was at the bar. After what Frank did, I decided I’d been given a new chance at life, and I took it.”

    “But you never were rich. You never had it easy. Dad says he made all the money.”

    “He’s right. I stayed a cop until I retired. It wasn’t easy. Your grandmother worried every day about whether I’d come home. But I had an example to follow. Things got better.”

    “It still seems a waste. Things should be easier.”

    “I know you feel that way. You’ve gotten everything free. You don’t understand what it means to work hard for something to go through despair, and then come out alive on the other side. I do. Your father does. You don’t. It’s like when Jesus died. The disciples went through despair, they had to wait, but when Easter Sunday morning came, there was a new power, something they wouldn’t have had if they didn’t go through the dark times.”

    “I like it easy! And besides, I don’t go to church.”

    “But consider this one thing,” said the old man, as he finished with the rose bushes, then watched as the afternoon sun reached them. It was the one place in the alley that got enough, almost enough, sunlight. “Which of us is happier?”

    (This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance of the events and persons to those in the real world is purely coincidental. Copyright © 2011 Henry E. Neufeld.)

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Christian Carnival #375

     

    Welcome to the April 13, 2011 edition of the Christian Carnival (#375). In addition, though I’m too tired to create a theme, I’m making editorial comments and even handing out a few awards, for what they’re worth.* The author’s comments are in quotes; mine aren’t.

    loswl presents His Thoughts are Higher than our Thoughts posted at INSPIKS, saying, “The wisdom of God is so far above man, it is on a different level altogether. Our intelligence, even at its best, is so small.” He really puts you down, but only in the best sort of way. I give this one the “best downer of the week” award.

    Kaleb presents The Case for the Virgin Birth posted at W2W Soul: Windows to The Woman’s Soul, saying, “Clearly depicted in the gospels of Matthew and Luke, the virgin birth is one of the more unambiguous accounts in the Bible yet is met with more opposition and criticism than many of the other miracles portrayed.” I think C. S. Lewis was the one who noted that we swallow the camel of the resurrection and then strain at the gnat of the virgin birth. I’ll probably regret quoting that without going and looking it up. Doubtless someone will correct me in the comments!

    Maryann Spikes presents Craig v Harris debate post mortem, audio and video posted at Ichthus77. This is postmortem++ run through a loop, but very instructive.

    Leah LaRue presents What is Wrong With the Church? ? 10 Things That Need to Stop! posted at Order in the Church!, saying, “This is my first time submitting; please let me know if additional information is required. Thanks much for your consideration!” Answer? You did it just fine! Welcome to the carnival! Having been in church leadership, I felt some of those points. How about an “ouch!” award?

    Nicholas Potts presents The depths of the soul and mind: Supposed Atheistic Neutrality… posted at The depths of the soul and mind, saying, “This article actually got circulated a little bit through some atheists blogs and some people got a little irritated with it.” While giving the word “worldview” a solid workout, Nick launches an all-out attack on the very concept of a neutral position, and even asks how we determine that a neutral position would be the best place to start.

    Jason Price presents What is Financial Stewardship? [Christian Financial Alliance] posted at One Money Design, saying, “What is Christian financial stewardship? Learn what it means from several Christian personal finance bloggers.” Do you know what stewardship is? Some folks think it means responding to the most recent appeal for money, such that “stewardship” is a synonym for (generous) giving. You’ll get some ideas on what it really means from this post.

    Maryann Spikes presents God (is) the Golden Rule (ought) without offending Hume posted at Ichthus77. OK, I’m letting Maryann by with an extra post, since this one’s so much fun. (Besides, she pointed me to the Christian Apologetics Alliance.) I’m going to make a bet with myself that most of you haven’t asked the question she’s answering. (And no, it’s not my everyday sort of question either.)

    Philip Carlson presents A Lesson from the Qur’an posted at Science and Theology in Apposition. I’m going to suggest a provocative question that might be answered in this post: In what way might the Qur’an tend to be better than your Bible? (Hint: The Bible I carry to church is not deficient in this area.)

    Tyra Ronan presents 40 Best Web Resources for Bible Study posted at A Blog of Biblical Proportions, saying, “You don’t have to be a Bible student, or planning for a career in the ministry, to benefit from the online Bible resources available. Anyone can find greater enjoyment and enlightenment from the holy scriptures when they look to using web resources. Whether you are looking for personal edification, or whether you are preparing a lesson for Sunday school, here are 40 of the best web resources for Bible study.” Who couldn’t make use of 40 links to Bible study resources? I just have to give this the “most links in one post” award for the week.

    CChisholm presents Six Biblical Easter Facts You Should Know posted at The Chisholm Source, saying, “Crucifixion is primarily an extreme method of torture/punishment and is not necessarily synonymous with death. Death normally resulted from crucifixion, but in history there are cases where a crucified man survived on the cross for a few days.” Most of these are about the crucifixion. I give this the “most gruesome post” award, but it’s still edifying!

    Ridge Burns presents Perspective posted at Ridge’s Blog. Different perspectives are rather helpful in coming to understand an issue. Good essay project: compare and contrast “worldview” (see above) and “perspective.” Why might one not wish to abandon elements of one’s worldview in discussion, yet value differing perspectives?

    Cameron Cloud presents Ring and Run: Missing an Eternal God in Prayer posted at Nephos. I give this one the “short and simple but challenging” award for the day!

    michelle presents committed? posted at going into all the earth…, saying, “the Radical Experiment…” OK, this post gets the “sneak attack” award. She starts with the “c” word and ends up on the “m” word. (Read it to find out …)

    Barry Wallace presents A gifted writer examines Rob Bell’s “Love Wins” posted at who am i?, saying, “Tim Stoner, author of The God Who Smokes, has written an excellent series of posts on Rob Bell’s new book Love Wins.” … and Barry provides us with some samples. This gets the “no carnival can be without it right now” award for today.

    Jeremy Pierce presents Evangelical Scholars’ Self-Esteem posted at Parableman, saying, “a look at the possible motives of evangelical scholars who leave behind evangelical convictions that are embarrassing in academic circles.” I was once told to go ahead and take a position and just not talk about those of my beliefs that didn’t accord with those of my potential employer. I think Jeremy outlines the situation with admirable clarity. I had to say ‘no’.

    They didn’t submit it, but I’m going to include a link to a post of links to this weeks posts (I’m not sure I made it through that. Is it grammatical?) from the Christian Apologetics Alliance. Thanks to Maryann for pointing this out.

    And just because there must be one of mine, I present A Misuse of the Word LITERAL from my Participatory Bible Study Blog. I further grant myself the “only post called ‘nonsense’ in the first comment” award. I know I ranted a bit, but nonsense? You be the judge. Not that I won’t argue with you!

    That concludes this edition. Submit your blog article to the next edition of The Christian Carnival using our carnival submission form. Past posts and future hosts can be found on our blog carnival index page.

    Technorati tags: , .

    * Not much. More like nothing.

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Christian Carnival 375 Coming

    Due to my schedule today, expect the carnival to be posted late afternoon to early evening.

  • Christian Carnival 374 Posted

    The 374th Christian Carnival has been posted at Beyond Belief. Thanks for hosting, Rodney!

    The 375th Christian Carnival will be right here at The Jevlir Caravansary.

    How can you get involved? Quoth the ending to Rodney’s carnival post:

    If you’re a Christian and you missed out this week, how about choosing something to contribute for next week’s edition? It doesn’t have to be a masterpiece, just a post that outlines your point of view or is designed to get others thinking. Being part of the carnival could be a great way to gain a little extra traffic at your blog.

    The easiest way to get involved is to submit your article through the Blog Carnival Submission Form. Otherwise, you can email the submission address.