Category: Short Stories

  • The Swing over the River

    “And then I let go when I’m at the farthest point out, drop into the river and swim to the far shore. The current will be helping me.”

    “And if you can’t make it?”

    “I’ll come up against that rock.”

    “What rock? I can barely see anything.”

    “There’s a rock in the water just where the river turns. If I can’t make it to shore, I will almost certainly end up at that rock.”

    “And if you miss?”

    They could both hear the roar of the rapids below.

    “If I miss, I’ll die, and you’ll think of another plan.”

    “I don’t think there is another plan.”

    “Let’s get going, then. The bandits can’t be far behind.”

    This is a work of fiction.
    Copyright © 2011
    Henry E. Neufeld

    Sheldon looked around. The ragged group of refugees had pretty much fallen where they stopped. In the darkness with just a waning moon, he couldn’t see their faces, but he knew there would be no hope. They’d been forced further and further south, and everyone knew one couldn’t ford the river here. Soon they would all be killed.But this kid thought he could swing out over the river, and get near enough to the other bank to avoid the rocks. He maintained that the current at that point would push him in the right direction. Not only that, but he’d have to do it with a rope tied around his waist. Once that rope was tied at both ends, they’d run another one, and let the people cross on the one rope while holding the other.

    It would be the end of the road for their mule, who was carrying the supplies. It was the kid again who had inclued that much rope in their load. He seemed to think there were few things that couldn’t be solved with the proper length of rope. Whether the refugees could cross the river in that manner remained to be seen. Sheldon doubted they’d all make it.

    The kid looked at the rope hanging from the tree. The memories were strong. The little river near his home, not too swift, but very muddy, and considered somewhat dangerous, especially for the very young. He’d only been five years old the first time he tried to swing out over the river, much too young. Nothing had ever stopped him. No amount of orders, no punishments, no matter how severe, could keep him away from the rope swing. And he was good.

    As he looked at the river below in the moonlight, he realized how fragile were his plans. There was no room for error. If he was any less skilled than he had said, he would land either amongst the rocks on this side or in the middle of the stream, where he would have no chance to reach the other bank before being swept around the turn and caught in the rapids.

    Then he heard his father’s voice. “It’s dangerous. It’s a waste of time. You need to learn to do useful things.” His father was very fond of useful, practical things. The swing over the river wasn’t useful. Fun, yes, but not useful. His father hadn’t understood fun.

    He positioned himself as far back as he could, to get the most momentum. “What do you think now, Dad?” he muttered, and launched himself over the river.

    He didn’t have time to think. He just reacted. One moment he was hanging from the rope, and the next he was dropping toward the water. He had time for just one thought: This is the biggest thrill I’ve ever experienced. I’d do it again in a heartbeat.

    Sheldon felt somewhat different. He only caught glimpses of the kid in the river. He thought he wasn’t close enough to the far bank. Then he saw him crawling out on the rock. He had come up against the rock–barely.

    At that moment all the kid could think was: Too bad I can’t tell my dad. Some useless activity!

    (This story has been submitted to the One Word at a Time Blog Carnival: Swings, though I think it’s mildly off track for that!)

  • The God-Talk Club Faces the End

    “So I guess I won’t be seeing you any more after tonight,” said Bob Norman, looking at Jerry.

    “And why would you say that?” asked Jerry, though his expression and tone indicated he wasn’t surprised.

    “May 21,” said Mac.

    “I expect May 21 will pass as many other May 21s have passed before,” said Jerry.

    “You didn’t expect to find anyone here that believes that nonsense, did you?” asked Mandy.

    Ellen chuckled. “Not likely,” she said.

    “So how am I supposed to tell the difference between one nut and another?” asked Bob, grinning to take away the sting. “Seriously, Jerry here believes any number of things I find irrational. He already knows that.” Jerry nodded. “In fact, you believe the rapture will happen soon, don’t you?”

    “Actually,” said Jerry, “I don’t believe in the rapture. I believe in a single second coming at a time nobody can predict. We are to live as though it might happen tomorrow, but we don’t know when it will happen.”

    “That’s weird,” said Bob. “I thought all Christians believed in the rapture. Do you believe Jesus might come back in your lifetime?”

    This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance between these characters and anyone in the real world is totally coincidental. Copyright © 2011, Henry E. Neufeld

    “As I said, I don’t know. I’m not supposed to know.”

    “What about the rest of you? Do you believe in the rapture?” asked Bob.

    Ellen shook her head.

    Mandy said “Not me.”

    Mac said, “I don’t count.”

    Mark said, “I’m not sure.”

    “You’re never sure,” put in Jerry.

    “I guess I’m the odd woman out, then,” said Justine.

    “So doesn’t it bother you that you’re the only one who believes that Jesus is coming back to take you off to heaven?” asked Bob.

    “No, and I think you’re missing something. Nobody said Jesus wasn’t coming back. We just disagree on the details and how last day events fit together. I believe in the rapture. I’m premillenial. Jerry, I’d guess, is amillenial. It doesn’t matter to me, as long as we believe Jesus is coming back.”

    “So if you don’t believe in the rapture, what does it mean that Jesus is coming back?” asked Bob.

    “If you’re going to call them nuts, you really should get your varieties straight,” said Mac. “And believe me, I think this end of the world stuff is nuts in almost any form. But there are Christians who believe in a second coming where everything is open and public, and everything ends at once. There are other Christians who believe that all the ‘saved’ people will be taken to heaven and others will be left behind for the tribulation time.”

    “How do you keep this stuff straight?” asked Bob, but everyone could tell it was rhetorical.

    “On the other hand there are Christians who believe that God’s kingdom simply wins and takes over in the end, like leaven working its way through dough.” Mandy could always be counted on to provide the unexpected answer.

    “I like that one,” said Mark.

    “But do you think it’s true?” asked Jerry.

    “I really don’t know,” said Mark.

    “It’s pretty complicated, as a result of the number of different Bible books that talk about it in inconsistent ways,” said Mandy.

    “I wouldn’t call it inconsistent,” said Jerry. “You just have to understand what applied to what time. Most of the prophecies applied to the immediate time frame, and then give a quick look at the final consummation right at the end.”

    “It looks pretty inconsistent to me,” said Mark.

    “I still believe in the rapture. I used to think it was obvious, but after taking a class in eschatology here at the seminary, I discovered other ways to understand the texts. So I understand why people believe different things. It’s not clear, so differences of opinion are inevitable.”

    “But isn’t this something you should get clear?” asked Bob.

    “Why?” asked Mandy.

    “Well, it seems important! It’s the end of the world, after all!”

    “But what can I do about it?”

    “Well, you could get ready, I suppose.”

    “But that’s precisely what she’s supposed to be doing anyhow,” interrupted Jerry.

    “Exactly,” said Mandy.

    “In fact, if she didn’t, that would put her sincerity in question,” said Mark.

    “So you have to get it right and be sincere about it?” asked Bob.

    “You have to be real,” said Jerry.

    “If you don’t mean it, what good is it?” asked Mandy.

    “So let me get this straight,” said Mac. “I thought Christians were saved by faith. You’re telling me you have to do things?”

    “I’d think ‘actual faith’ would be a good term. If you say ‘I believe’ and you’re lying, it’s not much good.” Mandy looked at Jerry.

    “For once I pretty much agree, though I’d expand it a bit. The reformation saying was ‘saved by faith alone, but not by a faith that is alone.’ That suggests the faith must be real and that real faith results in real actions.”

    “So if you don’t do good deeds, you won’t be saved,” said Bob.

    “There will be good fruit in your life, yes,” said Jerry.

    “So you earn your way into heaven by doing those good deeds.”

    “No, you do good deeds because God has saved you.”

    “This is another one I don’t understand. Do you all agree on this?” asked Bob.

    Everyone nodded. “I think we might disagree on a few terms, but in general, we’d all agree with that,” said Justine.

    “So the idea is that you’re supposed to live as though Jesus might come and put an end to it all at any moment,” said Bob.

    “Precisely. Because Jesus is already here with us in any case,” said Jerry.

    “So why do various groups, like Adventists, make predictions about the end times at all? It just makes you look silly,” said Bob.

    “Well, Adventists are a small group. Most Christians don’t make such predictions,” said Jerry.

    “Adventists only made the one prediction–well, really two–back in the mid 19th century. Now they don’t do that any more,” said Mandy.

    “But they still harp on this ‘soon’ thing in terms of thinking it will happen in their lifetimes or within just a few years,” said Jerry.

    “But so do many other groups of Christians,” said Mandy.

    “And that’s what I don’t get,” said Bob. “I realize it’s easy to beat up on this Camping guy for giving such a precise prediction that will certainly turn out to be false. But other haven’t there been other dates?”

    “Some people thought Jesus would return by 1988 because Israel was restored as a nation in 1948, and they thought it must happen in a generation after that, you know, ‘this generation will not pass till all these things are fulfilled.’ I can’t remember precisely where that’s from.” It was the most Mark had added to the discussion for several sessions.

    “And that’s what seems crazy to me. Constantly going back to your holy book for a new timeline when all the timelines have failed before,” said Bob.

    “Which,” said Jerry, “Is why I don’t believe we should do anything of the sort. And the passage in question is part of what Jesus said about the last days in Matthew 24, Mark 13, and Luke 21. You quoted Matthew 24:34. That’s also where it says nobody knows the day or the hour (verse 36), but the 1988 folks thought they avoided that by saying that they weren’t giving a day and an hour, but only a year, and that as a deadline, not a specific year.”

    “Sounds like weasel-wording to me,” said Bob. “It seems like a pretty clear way to say you won’t know when.”

    “I agree,” said Jerry.

    “Mark it on your calendar folks,” said Ellen. “Bob and Jerry agree!”

    “I think it’s interesting that there’s all this hype about May 21, and here in a group like this I don’t find anyone that believes it,” said Bob.

    “I doubt you’d find anyone in any of the churches we attend. It’s a media circus. There are very few people who actually believe it.” Jerry didn’t even bother looking around the group, he was so sure of their agreement.

    “Absolutely,” said Mandy.

    “A couple folks in my church were disturbed enough to ask me, but as soon as I quoted a couple of the texts we’ve used here, they understood,” said Justine.

    “Well,” said Mac, “I’m going to have to be the first to leave today. I, for one, think we can continue the discussion next week!”

    “Yes,” said Bob. “Since you’re all going to be here after all, I’d like to know what you think about hell. Will God really fry sinners for all eternity, just for being wrong?”

    “I wouldn’t put it that way,” said Jerry. But the group was breaking up.

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Dying for a Bad Man

    Drooping spray of pink double roses, probably ...
    Image via Wikipedia

    “OK, Grandpa, why the h … heck are we here again?” The words were polite enough as the 17-year-old addressed his grandfather. The tone wasn’t.

    “Because you enjoy driving other people around in your car, and I’m paying for your gas.” The grandfather’s words were equally sharp and direct. It was how their relationship worked, much to the embarrassment of the boy’s parents.

    “OK, first point goes to you. But you know what I mean. I’d take you anywhere in the city and you know it. You could be looking out over the ocean. You could be in the park with green grass and trees. But you’re here in this run-down alley, messing around with those–what are they?–wanna-be roses?”

    “I am.”

    “But why?”

    “I like it here. I feel peace here. I feel life here.”

    “But why?”

    “What’s gotten into you today? You’d usually be in your car with the stereo turned up. Why do you care?”

    “It just seems strange. Every month or so you have me bring you here and you tend those roses. Why nobody has just dug them up, I don’t know. It’s just weird.”

    “You see that cross there, painted on the wall?”

    “Yeah.”

    “What does it say?”

    “It says some dude died here, 40 years ago.”

    “Thanks for the translation. Frank Baczkowski was my partner. He died right there.” He pointed to the middle of the alley.

    “You’re coming to the place where your partner died? Forty years ago?”

    “Yes.”

    “You feel peace?”

    “Yes.”

    “Life?”

    “Yes.”

    “Grandpa, we need to get you checked out. You’re going senile.”

    He chuckled. “There are worse things than dying.”

    “So he was a cop, right? Was he shot?”

    “Yes. He stepped out into the path of a bullet …”

    “Stupid!”

    “… to stop one man from shooting another.”

    “Oh. Was that you?”

    “No. I was right over there.” He pointed further down the alley. “There were some garbage cans between me and the shooter.”

    “But this Frank whatever dude, he saved someone’s life.”

    “Yes.” The old man went on tending the rose bushes.

    “Was it someone important?”

    “No, I suppose not.”

    “Was he a good person?”

    “No.”

    “Why?”

    “He ended up spending the rest of his life in jail.”

    “Sounds awful. I wouldn’t want to be here.”

    “True.”

    “OK. I can tell you’re in a mood. When you’re happy, you’re sarcastic. When you’re pissed at me, you go all quiet.”

    “Do you really want to know what happened?”

    “Yes. Yes, I think I do.”

    “It’s fairly simple. Frank and I were partners.  We were in the alley checking something out. I don’t even remember what it was. There was junk and garbage cans all over the place. Suddenly a man jumps out further down the alley and starts running, and another just appears in that end and starts shooting at him. Frank says to me, ‘I’ll distract him, you shoot him.’ I say ‘OK.’ So how does Frank distract him? He steps into the middle of the alley and he stops the next bullet. He yelled at the shooter, I assume to identify himself as a cop and to tell him to stop, but the bullet hit him before he got very far. Then I shot the bad guy. It turned out later they were rival criminals having a dispute.”

    He paused for a few moments. “There was a lot of debate about what Frank did. Some said he shouldn’t have given his life for such scum. Some said he couldn’t have known. Others said he should have found a way to stop the shooting without dying as he did it. I don’t know. There were only a few seconds. It happened. Frank was dead.”

    “But why do you find peace here?”

    “Because for all the reasons that shooting was a bad idea, it was pure Frank. He wouldn’t have cared whose life he saved. He wouldn’t have cared about the debates over how he did it. I know exactly what he would have said. He’d say, ‘It was the only way to be sure.’”

    “But at least you killed the bad guy.”

    “No, actually, I didn’t.”

    “You missed?”

    “I shot him, but he survived.”

    “What happened to him?”

    “Oh, he was executed for the murder.”

    “OK, but I still don’t see why you like this place.”

    “Frank and I had been going down hill. We were both drinking heavily, and I was neglecting my family. Your dad will remember those times. I was always at work, but sometimes when I was ‘at work’ I was at the bar. After what Frank did, I decided I’d been given a new chance at life, and I took it.”

    “But you never were rich. You never had it easy. Dad says he made all the money.”

    “He’s right. I stayed a cop until I retired. It wasn’t easy. Your grandmother worried every day about whether I’d come home. But I had an example to follow. Things got better.”

    “It still seems a waste. Things should be easier.”

    “I know you feel that way. You’ve gotten everything free. You don’t understand what it means to work hard for something to go through despair, and then come out alive on the other side. I do. Your father does. You don’t. It’s like when Jesus died. The disciples went through despair, they had to wait, but when Easter Sunday morning came, there was a new power, something they wouldn’t have had if they didn’t go through the dark times.”

    “I like it easy! And besides, I don’t go to church.”

    “But consider this one thing,” said the old man, as he finished with the rose bushes, then watched as the afternoon sun reached them. It was the one place in the alley that got enough, almost enough, sunlight. “Which of us is happier?”

    (This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance of the events and persons to those in the real world is purely coincidental. Copyright © 2011 Henry E. Neufeld.)

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • The Old Church’s Bones

    Put together dem bones,

    Dem bones, dem bones, dem dry bones.

    Dem bones, dem bones, dem dry bones.

    Dem bones, dem bones, dem dry bones.

    Now hear the word of the Lord.

    (Wikipedia)

    Ezekiel, from Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel ce...
    Image via Wikipedia

    The words kept running through Lakesha’s mind as she walked down the street from the school bus stop toward home. They’d been singing the song in choir, and she had asked where it came from. The teacher had read to them from Ezekiel 37.

    She looked at the church. It was old, but she could remember a year ago when it had been closed. At the last meeting the men of the church board sat at the front of the church and explained how they could no longer pay a pastor and no longer afford the maintenance. There was a sign out front that said the church was for sale, but nobody wanted property in this neighborhood.

    As she looked at the church she suddenly heard those words again: “Oh you dry bones, hear the word of the Lord.”

    It was so real that she looked around to see who might have spoken, but there was nobody there. Down the street she could see a drug deal taking place, but she knew none of those men had spoken.

    She turned back toward the church and heard again: “Prophecy to the bones: ‘Oh you dry bones, hear the word of the Lord!’”

    She looked around again, but still there was nobody there. Just a dead building, whose time had passed, in a neighborhood that was dying, if it was not already dead.

    She looked at the church again. “Oh you dry bones,” she whispered, “hear the word of the Lord.”

    She could feel a sense of emptiness, of dissatisfaction, as though her words were quieter than her whisper; no, as though they had been sucked up into a void.

    “Oh you dry bones,” she said a little bit louder. “Hear the word of the Lord!” Her voice almost reached a squeak by the end, but it seemed that they were swallowed up in a void.

    She remembered how often her mother had accused her of talking too loud. “Oh you dry bones,” she shouted, “Hear the word of the Lord!”

    She had the sense now that something was happening, that she might actually have been heard. In fact she had been. The drug dealer yelled at her.

    “You crazy? Shut up!”

    “Oh you dry bones,” she shouted again, “hear the word of the Lord!”

    He turned and walked away, apparently not wanted to be involved with such a crazy girl. She walked up to the church and pushed on the door. It swung open. The lock had long since been broken. There were beer and whiskey bottles lying around. The place was a mess.

    Lakesha had never been that religious of a girl, but suddenly the scene offended her. She had been able to tolerate the neighborhood because she thought she’d escape someday, go off to college, and never come back. That was how it worked. The people who stayed just continued to deteriorate.

    She grabbed a bottle and threw it out the window, a window that was already broken. Then another, and another. She made certain to throw them out the same window so they’d all be in a pile outside.

    A few minutes later she heard someone else come into the church. It was one of the church ladies, one of the folks who had given up in discouragement. “What are you doing here, girl?” she asked.

    “Oh you dry bones,” said Lakesha, “hear the word of the Lord!”

    The lady looked around. “Can these bones live?” she asked herself quietly. Then she grabbed a bottle and tossed it out the window. A few minutes later, someone else arrived, carrying a broom. Then someone more came, carrying a garbage can. They were all the women of the community, mostly elderly, along with a few teenagers and children.

    “Why haven’t we been meeting here?” asked one.

    “You thought it couldn’t be done,” said Lakesha.

    “The church board said it couldn’t be done.”

    “The church board never read Ezekiel, I think,” said Lakesha. “Or maybe they didn’t believe it.”

    *****

    It was a year later when a reporter came by the church. He’d heard strange stories about the little community. He showed up on a weekday during the day and found the church filled with people. There were no pews, but there was a kitchen, a pantry, a dining room, and back in what he thought might have been the pastor’s study he heard a sewing machine running. He asked for the pastor, and was directed to Lakesha.

    “You’re the pastor?” he asked.

    She laughed. “No, I’m just the loudmouth.”

    “I thought you were reviving the church here. This looks like a kitchen, or some kind of service organization.”

    “It is a service organization, it is a church, and it is revived,” said Lakesha.

    “But I don’t see any place to have a church service.”

    “Well, we don’t exactly have what you’d recognize as a church service. We just get together and pray and share and sing. We put the chairs out in a circle. Then we put them back around the table and we eat together.”

    “But where do you get the money for all of this?”

    “We just put what we have together and share it. You’d be amazed at what people can do in this community when they realize they can and just start trying.”

    “What about the drug dealers? What about crime?”

    “Some of our grandmothers walk down the streets at night and watch them. You’d be amazed at how fast they move.”

    “So how did it all get started?”

    “Oh you dry bones,” said Lakesha giggling, “hear the word of the Lord!”

     

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Finding the Rich Man’s Treasure

    http://www.wpclipart.com/money/. Per the licen...
    Image via Wikipedia

    Everybody knew that in a small village in the mountains there lived a very rich man.

    Just why he chose to live in a small village in the mountains nobody knew. Precisely which village was his home, nobody knew either. They just knew that somewhere in those mountains there lived a very rich man.

    Years went by, and there came a time when everybody knew that the rich man had died. Nobody knew precisely where or how, but it was certain that he had died. Everybody knew that.

    Shortly after the time when everybody knew he had died, a rumor appeared that the very rich man had hidden his treasure. It was said to include many wonderful things, and it was hidden in the mountains. Some said it was hidden in a treasure chest buried in the ground. Others thought it was piled up in a cave.

    Again, after a few years, everybody knew that this treasure included gold, magical devices of incredible power, and gems of miraculous size and incalculable value. This treasure was there just for the taking, if one could find it.

    Inevitably, since everybody knew the treasure was there, someone came along wanting to find it. He climbed the mountains and questioned villagers. He wasn’t very careful. He tortured people. He burned down their houses. The villagers were peaceful and content, and had no means to resist him.

    Finally one young man in an isolated mountain village said, “I am the rich man’s grandson. I know where the treasure is hidden. I’m the only one who does.”

    The treasure hunter started to beat the young man up. He tortured him, demanding that he reveal where the treasure was located. The young man endured the torture quietly. The look of peace on his face enraged the treasure hunter.

    “Tell me now where the treasure is, or I’ll kill you!” he shouted, holding the young man in place with one hand, and a knife in the other.

    “Very well,” said the young man. “The treasure is right here. I have it.”

    “But there is no treasure here,” said the treasure hunter.

    “Oh but there is! You’re just not equipped to see it.”

    The treasure hunter grew even more furious and killed the young man. Then he left the mountains in frustration.

    In a few more years, everybody knew that there was a treasure in those mountains. It was invisible to all but those who were most worthy. People spent their lives striving to be worthy to see the treasure. Holy orders arose, with the simple purpose of living lives worthy of just a glimpse of the treasure.

    Everybody knew, but they were neither rich, nor content.

    (This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance to any person or persons, living or dead, is entirely coincidental, or perhaps a result of the general human condition. Copyright © 2011, Henry E. Neufeld)

    (I’m submitting this post to the one word at a time blog carnival on the word “treasure.”)

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Our Pastor is Lazy

    Our Pastor is Lazy

    “You know why I wanted to talk to you today?” said Jim. His intonation indicated a question, but Emily Wall, Rev. Emily Wall, knew she was expected to know.

    “Yes, sir,” she said.

    Jim Evans, district superintendent looked across at the young lady on the other side of his desk. She had no right to look so calm and poised, even comfortable, under the circumstances. Truth be told, he felt a little intimidated by her. That PhD in New Testament from a prestigious university along with her intelligence and self-possession just seemed out of place in someone so young.

    “You can call me Jim,” he said. He’d said that many times before, but she was always a little formal with her superiors in the church organization.

    “Yes, Jim, I do understand.”

    Jim wondered why he felt that there was hostility in the atmosphere of the room. Emily seemed calm and was not challenging his authority in any way, yet he felt challenged. “Your church is going to ask that you not be reappointed, but they’ve asked me to talk to you first, before they make this official. This is entirely informal.”

    Jim waited for Emily to say something, but she simply sat there. Why couldn’t she take her cue? It was time for her to ask what she needed to do, how she could be reverse the decision of the SPR committee.

    “Well,” he said after a few moments, “your evaluation by the members of your congregation is not good. The members say that you’re arrogant, pushy, and, worst of all, lazy.” Jim thought he sensed a little bit of a reaction on the last word, but he wasn’t sure. She still looked peaceful. Again, she didn’t react.

    “Do you have any response to those comments?”

    “I’m not sure. I don’t believe I’ve been any of those things. I’ve been given a number of complaints, but I’d rather hear more specifics. Why do they think I’m arrogant?”

    This is a work of fiction. All persons, places, churches, and events are products of my imagination.
    Copyright © 2011, Henry E. Neufeld

    “Well, they mention here your emphasis on your doctoral degree. ‘Throwing it in our faces,’ is one comment.”

    “But I haven’t made anything of my doctorate. Other than my resume, where it’s kind of required, I don’t believe I’ve mentioned it at all.”

    “But it’s on the church sign.”

    “Yes, but it was put there without my permission, and I’ve asked to have it removed. In fact, I was promised it would be, but it just has never happened. It’s possible that I got a bit pushy about getting it removed.”

    Jim grinned at her reference to the second complaint. He wasn’t surprised. He’d never heard her say anything about her degree either. It was there. She’d done it. She was, in fact, brilliant. But you’d never know about it unless you read the actual record. “OK, I see that.”

    “Actually,” Emily continued, volunteering something for the first time, “I asked that they remove my name from the sign entirely. I don’t see any need for my name on the sign. What does that accomplish? And the way it is now just looks pretentious: ‘Rev. Dr. Emily Wall, PhD, Senior Pastor?’ That’s … I don’t have a word for it. It makes me shudder every time I see it. I’m the only pastor, so I suppose I’m ‘senior’ but Reverend Doctor?” She’d showed an emotion other than calm for the first time in the conversation.

    “They’re proud of their pastor,” said Jim.

    “Yet they want to get rid of her.”

    “Well, not precisely. They want to make an arrangement to work with you. But before we look at that, let’s look a bit more at why they say you’re pushy. It’s not just about the sign. They say you have asked every mission committee meeting what they’re going to do to be missionaries before the next meeting.”

    “Yes, I ask that.”

    “Every meeting?”

    “Yes.”

    “But why approach it that way?”

    “Because they aren’t doing anything to be missionaries between meetings. The mission committee meets to distribute the mission budget money to various causes. Then they talk about how they can raise more money. Sometimes they come up with ideas, but they never implement them. But more importantly, they don’t actually do anything. They want to give away a little money, but they don’t want to get involved.”

    “Well, perhaps that’s their role. Not everyone can go.”

    “I think everyone can do something. I think everyone should do something. There are dozens of projects that could be undertaken within a couple of miles of the church.”

    “But couldn’t you come up with a more gentle and tactful way of bringing it up?”

    “I tried tact. My predecessor tried tact. So did his. I wanted to get their attention.”

    “You did, but not in a good way.”

    “Why do you say it’s not a good way?”

    “Because they’re going to ask not to have you appointed again. You can’t do any good at all if you’re gone.”

    “Perhaps I’ll do some good somewhere else.”

    “I don’t think I like that dismissive attitude.”

    “I didn’t mean to be dismissive. It’s important to me to try to get the members of the church to be disciples, and I believe that means being missionaries, whether it’s down the block or around the world. If doing so offends them, I’ll have to live with that. I don’t want to come up on judgment day and have Jesus ask me whether I ever told them they were called to be missionaries.”

    “I see. I do think you could find a better way to do it. But let’s go on to the next issue. They think you’re lazy. Do you know why they think that?”

    “Yes, that one I do know. I only preached at two services in the last two months.”

    “That’s what the lay leader told me, but I wasn’t sure whether I should believe it. Why didn’t you preach those Sundays? Were you sick?”

    “No, I wasn’t sick, and I was right there in the congregation. I had lay speakers preach on those Sunday mornings.”

    “Lay speakers.” Jim paused. “I know you’ve really pushed lay speaking in your church, but if I had known that was happening earlier, I would have put a stop to it. You’re expected to be in the pulpit regularly on Sunday morning.”

    “I think that’s wrong.”

    “Wrong? It’s our standard practice.”

    “The standard practice is wrong.” He was amazed that it didn’t sound arrogant. The conviction behind the sentence seemed to be beyond arrogance–absolute conviction. Then she continued. “When I arrived at that church there was only one lay speaker, and he had never spoken at anything. I arranged to have him preach for the first time. His training was not really that good, and I spent hours helping him with his sermon. He did very well. Now we have half a dozen lay speakers. That first lay speaker is now working full time at another church.”

    “Where? I didn’t know that!”

    “It’s a small non-denominational church, but it has doubled in membership since he started preaching there. I think they’re going to ordain him.”

    “So it’s not a Methodist church then. You know we didn’t lay hands on you so you could send members to other churches. Your job is to build the church to which you’re assigned.”

    “My job? Perhaps. But my call is to make disciples. My call is to equip the church for ministry. That man was ready to go out and serve. He just needed the confidence and a push. He needed someone to recognize what God had gifted him and called him to do.”

    “But what about those other lay speakers. Do you have to have them preaching all that often? Perhaps you could have a lay revival every year and give them the chance to learn.”

    “I don’t think that would be enough. To learn to preach the gospel you need to preach the gospel. Where better to learn than in your home church?”

    “But what about the ministry to your own members. I got a separate letter from one of your church members. He brought a business associate to visit the church, and a lay speaker preached. He had hoped to have the man hear one of your sermons. Don’t you think the impression you make on visitors is important?”

    “Yes, I think it’s important. But the impression I want to give is not of my intelligence or my speaking ability, but of my commitment to Christ.”

    “Of course we want them to see your commitment to Christ. We want you and the church to be committed to Christ. But people don’t necessarily look at the things we want them to see. The church member who wrote the letter hoped his friend, a prominent businessman, would join the church. But he wasn’t interested in hearing lay speakers.”

    “Again, I believe my job is to equip the church, the whole church for ministry. To do that I need ministry for them to do. For those called to preach, I need to give them the opportunity.”

    “But you’re talking about working yourself out of a job. If the pastor isn’t in the pulpit, the people won’t think she is needed.”

    “I’d love not to be needed in that sense, but I don’t think it’s going to happen any time soon. I’ve spent more time with each of those lay speakers before they preached than I would spend preparing my own sermon.”

    “But the one thing the people really like about you is your preaching. Yet that’s precisely what you won’t give them. What do you expect them to do?”

    “I expect them to get into ministry themselves. In evaluating myself, I would not rate my preaching as all that effective. I entertain people. I’m good at fashioning a speech that they like, but I’m not that good at getting people moving.”

    “Well, you do have your fans. I know the district coordinator for lay speakers thinks you’re one of the greatest. He wants to make sure you’re reappointed somewhere in the district so he can use you at training events.”

    “I appreciate that.”

    “Unfortunately, you don’t have many fans at the church.”

    “So why didn’t they just recommend I not be reappointed?”

    “I think they’re rather proud to have a 26 year old pastor who has a PhD from a prestigious university. That’s probably why they put so much emphasis on the sign.”

    “But it’s the wrong reason for them to want to keep a pastor.”

    “You may have to work with whatever reason they have.”

    Again, there was an awkward pause as Emily didn’t offer any further thoughts.

    “What they’ve proposed is a covenant for next year.”

    “I believe I’ve seen this.”

    “Well, there are several major points. First, they want you to preach 48 out of the 52 Sundays during the coming year.  I believe this is quite reasonable. I’ve known pastors to commit to 50.”

    Again Emily added nothing.

    “They want you to commit to personally doing all the hospital visitation. They want additional church office hours.”

    “But they don’t make use of the hours I am present.”

    “Nonetheless they want more hours. What are you doing with your time anyhow? You’re not preaching, you’re not doing visitation, you’re apparently not in your office. What do you do?”

    “Well, it’s not true that I don’t do visitation. What I have been doing is taking gifted church members with me and then letting them do visitation on their own. I’m often not in the office because I’m doing some of those mission projects that I want the members to get involved in.”

    “But I thought you couldn’t get the church involved in those missions.”

    “No, I couldn’t get the mission committee involved. I have church members out serving in the community every day, and I work with them.”

    “So you do it without the approval of the mission committee.”

    “I don’t think I need the committee to approve my going to a soup kitchen with a few members and serving people.”

    “But the mission committee probably thinks you need their approval.”

    “Did they complain?”

    “No.”

    “They wouldn’t.”

    “Yes,” said Jim after a moment. “That wouldn’t fit with the pattern.”

    “Why haven’t I heard from any of these other members, you know, the ones who are out doing service projects with you?”

    “I think it might be because they’re busy doing things. And they’re not really all that knowledgeable about church politics. Some of them may not even know one can complain to the district superintendent.”

    “Well, it doesn’t matter a great deal. The people who have the power are the ones who are complaining and they’re demanding that you sign this covenant they’ve proposed or they’re going to ask that you not be reappointed.”

    “I see.”

    “I think it’s your best option. We need you where you are. That church needs you. The only way you can continue in the ministry God has called you to is to accept these conditions.”

    “So in order to be permitted to do ministry I have to agree not to do it?”

    “I wouldn’t put it like that. I’d suggest that you take a little more time. Work more slowly and carefully.”

    “Pastors have been doing that for years. It hasn’t worked.”

    “It’s the only option.”

    “But that’s not true, is it?”

    “What do you mean?”

    “The bishop can appoint me where he wants me. He can go against the church’s recommendation.”

    “Is that what you’re expecting?”

    “I’m not really expecting anything. I’m just pointing out that the SPR committee of that one church doesn’t have the final say.”

    “I’ll tell you not to expect it. Your choice is clear. Sign the covenant, or plan to be reappointed elsewhere, probably to a smaller church.”

    He pushed the document across the desk toward her …

  • The God-Talk Club: Naturalism and Miracles

    Prevailing model of the origin and expansion o...
    Is it just an appearance of age?Image via Wikipedia

    “Hey guys, I have this quote from Albert Mohler about evolution,” said Bob.

    “So let’s hear it,” said Mac.

    Bob quoted:

    As I have stated repeatedly, I accept without hesitation the fact that the world indeed looks old. Armed with naturalistic assumptions, I would almost assuredly come to the same conclusions as BioLogos and the evolutionary establishment, or I would at least find evolutionary arguments credible. But the most basic issue is, and has always been, that of worldview and basic presuppositions. The entire intellectual enterprise of evolution is based on naturalistic assumptions, and I do not share those presuppositions. Indeed, the entire enterprise of Christianity is based on supernaturalistic, rather than merely naturalistic, assumptions. There is absolutely no reason that a Christian theologian should accept the uniformitarian assumptions of evolution. In fact, given a plain reading of Scripture, there is every reason that Christians should reject a uniformitarian presupposition. The Bible itself offers a very different understanding of natural phenomena, with explanations that should be compelling to believers. In sum, there is every reason for Christians to view the appearance of the cosmos as graphic evidence of the ravages of sin and the catastrophic nature of God’s judgment upon sin. (Quote of the Day on Jesus Needs New PR – while this story is fiction, the quote is real, as is, of course, Dr. Albert Mohler!)

    “It seems pretty unremarkable to me,” said Jerry.

    “It sounds to me like he’s saying God lied and we can’t really do science,” said Mark.

    “How is that?” asked Jerry.

    “If God makes the universe appear old, but it isn’t, what’s the purpose? It seems deceptive.”

    “Maybe he’s testing our faith,” said Justine.

    “Testing your faith?” asked Bob, puzzled.

    “Yes. He’s trying to see if we’ll believe him or not.”

    “But Justine,” said Mark, “it seems that he’s asking us whether we believe him or our senses.”

    “I’d say it’s more like a test as to whether you believe an ancient book written by primitive people, or the best evidence of your own senses,” put in Mac.

    “It seems to me,” said Jerry slowly, “that we’re making an assumption here. Why would God need to make the physical universe at any particular time in its history? Why is the default position that it should look its actual age?”

    “Why not make the universe look just the age it is?” asked Mark.

    This is a work of fiction. All persons and events, with the exception of the reference to and quote from Dr. Albert Mohler, are products of my imagination.

    The story is part of the God-Talk Club Series.

    Copyright © 2011, Henry E. Neufeld

    “Well, lets say God created more people than just humans here on earth. Let’s say he also creates an intelligent race on a planet that orbits a sun a couple of billion light years from here. If he made the universe look like it was just 6,000 years old, the distance would have to be very small. So I would think the universe needs to have the appearance of age in order to accommodate the space for all of God’s creation.”

    “But how would that work with oil and coal? Those imply that there was death, whereas in your scenario, God wouldn’t have created life that early. Yet he plants the remains of life under the soil so we’ll see evidence that there was life way back then.”

    “Well, he had to provide oil somehow,” said Jerry. “Why do you choose one method over another?”

    “I don’t suppose we could be wrong about what formed the oil, could we?” said Justine, cutting Jerry off.

    “I was about to say,” Jerry continued, “that an alternative explanation there was that geological formations were created by the flood, so, as Justine says, oil might have been produced in a different way than modern scientists believe.”

    Bob was shaking his head. “This is just amazing. All of science is swept aside because your book must be true! Unbelievable!”

    “I bet Mandy doesn’t have any problems with it at all. Do you, Mandy?” said Mac.

    “No, I don’t. I have no problem with God using evolution to create and diversity life.”

    “Well, technically, evolution isn’t the process that creates life. That’s abiogenesis,” said Mac.

    “On the contrary,” said Bob, “while the processes may be somewhat different, some of the same principles of variation plus selection may well apply. We just don’t know precisely–or even generally–how it works.”

    “Yet you believe it happened,” said Jerry, looking puzzled. “Why is that?”

    “It seems pretty clear to me,” said Bob. “There’s life. It must have gotten here somehow. We have a number of excellent leads, so it’s not unreasonable to suppose one or another will work out.”

    “That seems to me to be a rather incredible statement of faith.”

    “I suppose you drive a car,” Bob responded.

    “Yes, I do. But don’t try comparing the way a car works to theories of abiogenesis.”

    “No, that isn’t my point. Is it faith that makes you believe your car will run?”

    “No, I know how the car works, and it has worked before.”

    “Precisely! I know how science works. In one area after another ignorance has been displaced by leads and ideas, and then finally to explanations. I believe it will work this way too. You call that faith. I call it learning from experience.”

    “But you still trust science. Scientists have been wrong so many times. Why do you think you have it right now?” This came from Justine.

    “Oh, I have no doubt that,” said Bob. “I’m wrong about many things. What I do know is that science has successfully solved problems and come up with new information. And many of those ‘wrong’ answers were quite workable in their context. Newtonian physics handles quite a lot of problems even if we do know its limitations now.”

    “I want to get back to an earlier point,” said Jerry. “I still maintain that Bob’s statement is a statement of faith. He believes in science. He believes it can solve everything. I can solve many problems on my calculator, but no matter how many I solve, it doesn’t mean I can solve everything. Science can solve many puzzles, but that doesn’t mean it can solve everything.”

    “But the problems you can’t solve with your calculator are of a different nature than the ones you can,” said Bob. “I think the origin of life is a similar problem to the ones we have already solved. I see no reason why it cannot be solved as well.”

    “To me the creation of life is a very different problem from birth even of new species,” said Jerry. “But I also want to go back to an earlier point that Mark made. Mark, why would you say that Dr. Mohler’s statement makes science impossible. Certainly many people who believe as he does do carry out scientific research.”

    “One consistent thing about people is that they are inconsistent,” said Mandy.

    “Let Mark answer,” said Jerry.

    “If God lied in one area–the appearance of age–then how can we trust anything else. He could have set up the evidence to mislead us intentionally.” Mark looked thoughtful and troubled.

    “I don’t see how God is lying,” said Jerry. “We’re misinterpreting the data.”

    “But it seems to me that God is intentionally making us misinterpret the data. God could quite easily create the universe 12 or 13 million years ago and then create life now. Then it would be what it appeared to be. I just don’t like the idea that God is making it impossible for us to use our senses.”

    “But Dr. Mohler argues that some of this is the result of sin,” said Justine. “The universe is messed up because of sin. That’s why we can’t interpret it correctly.”

    “Or even more,” Bob added, “because we’re sinful we can’t interpret the data correctly.”

    “But what does sin have to do with the appearance of age?” asked Mandy.

    “The flood is certainly a result of sin according to the Bible,” said Jerry. “If it produced the appearance of age in the rocks, that appearance would be a result of sin.”

    “Well, scientifically, the idea that a worldwide flood created the oilfields and coal deposits is quite ludicrous,” said Bob.

    “You’re sure that’s not something that will be revised,” said Justine.

    “In general, revisions of scientific theories don’t involve completely invalidating well established laws,” said Bob. “They usually result in adjusting or refining. No, I don’t find it likely that science will be revised sufficiently to allow a worldwide flood to explain geological features such as oil fields.”

    There was a pause. “What I don’t understand, Mandy,” Bob continued, “is how you can stomach being associated with someone like Dr. Mohler, when you know what he’s said is nonsense.”

    “I have the same problem,” said Mark.

    “I don’t think what he said is nonsense. I disagree. I’m not embarrassed to call him a brother in Christ. That may not mean that much to you, Bob, but I think Jerry and Justine can understand what I’m saying. I don’t agree with his comment about naturalistic assumptions, because I believe in God, I think as much as he does. But I can disagree, even vehemently disagree, without despising.”

    “I guess we’ll have to discuss ‘naturalistic assumptions’ some other time,” said Jerry. “I don’t see how you get away from them.”

    “I have no problem with science sticking with naturalistic assumptions. If they didn’t, what would theologians have to do?” Mandy was grinning.

    But it was time for the group to part for the evening.

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Time to Shine

    Jerusalem temple, solomon's temple, third temple
    The older people who had seen Solomon's temple wept when they saw the rebuilt temple.Image via Wikipedia

    “Arise! Shine! Your light has come! [Isaiah 60:1] Bah!” said the man with the white hair and long beard.1

    “So you didn’t really like what the prophet said,” answered the other, somewhat younger man.

    “Oh, the words were pretty. He’s a good talker, no doubt. But what do you think?” He looked down the road. It led to Jerusalem, where the temple was rebuilt–sort of–but where there were no walls. But there were enough ruins. Yes, plenty of those, telling the story of better days.

    The younger man watched the other’s eyes and saw his thoughts reflected there. “But you know, the prophet stood amongst those ruins and made his proclamation. ‘Your light has come!’ Did your spirit not stir within you?”

    “Oh, I think my spirit is past stirring. My spirit stirred when Sheshbazzar [Ezra 1] called for people to leave Babylon and return and rebuild Jerusalem. Oh, those were the days! We had pictures in our heads, beautiful pictures of what Jerusalem would look like, what the new temple would look like.”

    This is a work of fiction, based on the texts cited in square brackets []. The characters and dialog are my own invention. Copyright © 2011, Henry E. Neufeld.

    “I think the temple is beautiful now! It’s a sign of what can be.”

    “Oh, but you should have heard the older people wail when they saw the new temple. ‘Nothing like Solomon’s temple,’ they said [Haggai 2:3]. And they were probably right. What do I know? But I thought like you do now. I thought we’d make it work. I thought we’d soon have the city rebuilt.”

    “But we’ve come a long way! We can rebuild!”

    “Bah! You young’uns. Wait till you’ve lived as long as I have and see how little things have changed.”

    “So what should we do?”

    “We stay and we work. What else can we do? Do you have the money to move back to Babylon?”

    “I’ve never seen Babylon. I wonder if it’s as good a place as some of you older folks say.”

    “It’s better.”

    “Better? Than what?”

    “Look around you.” His eyes wandered, pausing on the tumbled down stones of the gate that hadn’t been rebuilt, then moving to the scattered piles of rock that had once been part of the town wall. He looked at the dusty road, where trees should have been growing. He looked back toward the town where a few houses had been restored, and where he knew very little grain had been stored. ‘Caravans cover our roads? Wealth of the nations coming to us [Isaiah 60:6]?’ Trading for what? Buying what? ‘Nations come to our light?’ What light? We don’t have enough oil for our lamps. You tell me, what light?”

    “But shouldn’t we believe God’s prophets?”

    “Oh, we had prophets in the old days too. ‘You’re going home,’ they said. ‘God has decided this is enough [Isaiah 40:2],’ they said. And now look at us! Believe me, none of us who heard those words thought we’d be spending our old age starving in the ruins.”

    “So what do we do?”

    “What can we do?” He paused and looked into the distance. “Yes, what can we do?”


    What do you think? Is the old man right or wrong based on what you know of history?

    When you’ve considered that, ask yourself whether you see prophecies of the second coming of Jesus in the same way. Do you use the same arguments? Do you see any parallels?


    1 This story is based on the idea of deutero- and trito-Isaiah, which would have a prophet preaching late in the Babylonian exile and another preaching to the exiles at some point during rebuilding. If you prefer, think instead of a reading from an existing scroll of Isaiah.

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • The God-Talk Club – New Year’s Resolutions

    Two New Year's Resolutions postcards
    Image via Wikipedia

    “So what’s your New Year’s resolution,” asked Ellen, looking at Mac.

    “I don’t do New Year’s resolutions. Come to think of it, I don’t do resolutions at all. I figure I am who I am.”

    “Let your yea be yea and your nay, nay,” intoned Jerry.

    “Trying to make me into a Christian, Jerry?” asked Mac.

    “No. Well, yes, but this wasn’t an example of it. It sounds to me like you’re living like that text.”

    “Making a resolution just makes me tense. If I really decide to do it, I do it. Making it a resolution just makes it harder.”

    “Well, I like to make resolutions,” said Ellen.

    “I bet you keep them, too,” said Mandy.

    “I do!” exclaimed Ellen, smiling. “How would you guess that?”

    “You just seem like the sort of straightforward person who wouldn’t like resolutions if she didn’t keep them. You’re just too happy with the idea. It has to work for you.”

    This is a work of fiction. All persons and events are products of my imagination. It’s part of the God-Talk Club series, where you can find a list of characters. Copyright © 2010, Henry E. Neufeld.

    “Well, it does,” said Ellen. “But it sounds like not doing resolutions works for Mac as well.”

    Mandy was always impressed by how easily Ellen dealt with differences. The group had ignored her as their waitress until she had kind of pushed her way into the discussion.

    “I always try to get my church members to make resolutions and do so publicly, so that other members can hold them accountable,” said Justine.

    “Whoa,” said Bob. “That sounds spooky!”

    “What’s spooky about it?” asked Justine.

    “Well, all that trying to control people’s lives. ‘Holding people accountable’ sounds a little authoritarian to me.”

    “But nobody makes them do it,” said Justine, truly puzzled.

    “I bet there’s a lot of social pressure. Emotional manipulation.”

    “I don’t see that at all,” said Justine.

    “What happens to a member who doesn’t make a public resolution?” asked Bob.

    “Well, nothing. We don’t have some sort of punishments or anything.”

    “Will the rest of your group look down on them if they don’t make a resolution?”

    “I wouldn’t think so.”

    “So how to you encourage them. Do you call it a good thing to do?”

    “Of course I do.”

    “So if they don’t do it, then it’s a bad thing.”

    “I wouldn’t say that.”

    “Well, at least not as good.”

    “Well, true. I do think it’s better if they do.”

    “So there’s social pressure to do it. They’ll be thinking that others will think less of them if they don’t make a resolution, make it public, and be ‘accountable’ as you say, to the church.”

    “OK, yes, but I don’t see how that gets us to social pressure and manipulation.”

    “But it seems obvious to me.”

    “I think your problem, Bob, is that you’re making voluntary participation equivalent to manipulation.” Jerry joined the conversation for the first time.

    “But there’s a thin line between social pressure and unfair force or manipulation, or even just plain controlling behavior.”

    “But you don’t know that the people in Justine’s church behave that way.”

    “No, but I do know that some churches are overly controlling. I think we should go out of our way to avoid that.”

    “I’m sure it can go too far,” said Jerry. “But on the other hand, we could give up all forms of social control and accountability. Wouldn’t that also be bad?”

    “Well, I think churches having less control would be a good thing.”

    “But you don’t think all private associations are a bad thing, do you?” asked Mandy.

    “Well, I really don’t think much of most organizations that try to control their members and ‘hold them accountable.’”

    “You don’t like private organizations at all?” asked Mandy.

    “Oh, I like private organizations. Groups of people who are like-minded on some issue or another. They work together because they like to.”

    “But you assume my church members aren’t there because they like to be?” asked Justine.

    “Oh I don’t assume that. But church membership is very important in American life. I think many people are there just because there is social pressure to be there.”

    “In this part of the country I doubt that,” said Jerry.

    “What about fraternities and sororities?” asked Ellen.

    “I really don’t like them all that much. They pressure young men and women to follow a social norm rather than be themselves.”

    “You’re no fun,” said Ellen. But she said it sweetly.

    “How do you do that?” asked Bob.

    “Do what?” said Ellen.

    “You can put somebody down so very gently.”

    “I didn’t know I was putting anyone down,” said Ellen.

    “That’s probably it. You actually say it like you like me.”

    “But I do like you,” said Ellen with a slightly puzzled frown.

    “The thing about Ellen,” said Mac, “is that she’s easily the most genuine person in the room. She is just who she is.”

    “But I think all of you are!” exclaimed Ellen.

    Everybody laughed. Mac shrugged and lifted her hands, gesturing her surrender.

    “But I’m still not comfortable with what Justine is doing,” said Mark. “I don’t think whatever we say should apply to churches more than any other group of people. But Justine’s ‘accountability’ thing still makes my skin crawl.”

    “What about it is so bad?” asked Justine.

    “Getting up in front of the church and making your resolution? Asking other church members to hold you accountable? These people might not be your friends. They might just be looking for gossip. Why would I want to make a real resolution in front of them?”

    “Well, they’re supposed to be your family,” said Justine.

    “That’s biblical,” added Jerry.

    “But how does it work in practice?” asked Mark. “I suspect that many people do spread gossip about things they find out while they’re holding people accountable.”

    “People do gossip. It’s a sin, but they do it anyhow.” Justine shrugged.

    “So perhaps we should be careful how we do things in that case,” said Mandy.

    “So you don’t like the idea either,” said Justine.

    “No, I don’t really. I’d encourage people to make resolutions. I’d encourage them to find friends who can hold them accountable. But I’d suggest they do it with a few friends.”

    “Well, I take seriously the idea that we’re the body of Christ. We’re even told to confess our faults one to another.”

    “I just see that as potentially very dangerous considering we can’t be sure everyone in a particular church is following the same spirit.”

    “Don’t you think the churches in New Testament times had similar problems?” asked Jerry.

    Mandy paused a moment. “I suspect they did, but we don’t know precisely how they applied ideas like confessing faults one to another. Was it in a group setting with the whole church? Was it with a few trusted people? I don’t think we know.”

    Jerry was intent. The New Testament church subject got his attention. “I’d suggest we do know. That’s why gossip is so high on the various lists of sins. They confessed to one another, and one of the things they held one another accountable about was gossip!”

    “I’d suggest instead,” said Mandy, “that we don’t really know the details of how they dealt with these problems, and perhaps we should use some contemporary wisdom.”

    “I’m with Mandy,” said Mark.

    “Wow,” said Ellen. “I just ask whether people have made resolutions, and it becomes a philosophical debate! I thought it would be fun to compare notes.”

    “OK, I’ll go with that,” said Bob. “Just because I don’t like the whole church thing doesn’t mean I don’t like resolutions. I have made a resolution to complete three scientific papers I’ve been working on and get them published this year.”

    “Oh, thinking of moving up to the college or graduate school scene?” asked Jerry.

    “And just how would it be ‘moving up’?” asked Bob.

    “Isn’t that the normal career path?”

    “Perhaps, but I think the place for science education in this country right now is at the high school level. I’m going to stay where I am, teaching kids about science.”

    “So why do you want to publish those papers?” asked Jerry, genuinely puzzled.

    “Professional development, contribution to science, and yes, a good bit of ego.”

    “I can understand that,” said Ellen.

    “So what’s your resolution?” asked Bob. “You started this!”

    “My resolution is to read one serious book every week next year.”

    “That’s a good one,” said Mandy.

    “So what’s yours?” asked Ellen, looking at Mandy.

    “I have resolved to start my doctoral studies online. I’m interested in technology education. I’ve been intending to start for a long time and just haven’t gotten around to it. Next year is the year.”

    “What about you, Jerry?” asked Mandy after a short pause.

    “I’ve determined to share my faith with at least one identifiable person each week next year.”

    “Make me feel like a target,” muttered Bob.

    “I didn’t mean convert you. Just share my faith. But you’d only count as one person, even if I do share with you every week during the year.” It was the closest Jerry came to joking.

    “So what is yours, Justine?” asked Bob. “You’re making all your church members do resolutions. Surely you have!”

    “Yes, I have, but I wonder if I should share it with you.” Justine was grinning.

    “OK. I deserved that.”

    “Oh, I don’t mind. My resolution is to include our young people more in church leadership. By the end of the year, I plan to see young people active and in leadership in every area of the church. I’ve made a chart so I can track it.”

    “Yay!” Ellen clapped her hands. “What about you, Mark?”

    “Oh, I haven’t made any resolutions. I’m more like Mac. I do what I do, and don’t make a special issue of days.”

    “Well, at least it’s not a Christian vs. Atheist issue this time,” said Bob.

    “Be thankful for small blessings,” said Mandy.

    And that was the end of the evening.

    Enhanced by Zemanta
  • Traitor Tad: Prison Camp

    By afternoon, the area was filling with aliens, and Tad was beginning to wonder just how they could all eat. It didn’t seem that they were expecting him to solve that problem, however, so he decided to work on problems that he could at least comprehend. The first one that came to mind was the need to deal with his prisoners.

    After his moment of glory, when he had announced that they were all the prisoners of Traitor Tad (A Disorienting Morning), he had asked his portable gun whether it could keep guard, preferably not killing anyone, and since then the prisoners had remained gathered in a group near the mouth of the canyon. The gun had never once fired; the prisoners were more afraid of the aliens, and everywhere they turned there were more aliens.

    This is a work of fiction. All persons, places, and events are products of my imagination. It is part of my Traitor Tad science fiction series. Copyright © Henry E. Neufeld.

    Another thing that puzzled Tad was that there had been no further attacks. He knew there were several armored divisions on the ground on this planet, and quite a lot of air and space power, and he knew that the aliens were not actually providing any opposition. Surely the commanders of their force would be able to divert enough firepower to eliminate him and his few pieces of equipment. So why didn’t they?

    He couldn’t figure that out, so he dismissed it from his mind and went to deal with the problems he could handle. He had asked the Shuttle’s AI what it thought he should do with the prisoners. It said it had no opinion. He figured he’d have to ask it sometime how you could keep more than 200,000 troops on a planet and in orbit with no real enemy, and not have someone start asking questions.

    It wasn’t until he was almost at the make-shift prison camp that he had his solution–or so he thought.

    “There he is,” came the shout as he approached. The prisoners surged toward him.

    For a moment he thought the prisoners were going to trample him, but then the gun fired one shot into the ground between him and them, and they stopped. There was quite a lot of confusion before they settled into some form of order. There were about half a dozen in front who seemed ready to talk to them, but it quickly became clear there was no agreed upon spokesman.

    “You must surrender yourself to me and return to the ship!” said one.

    “You idiot,” said another. “How can he get us to any of the ships? He’s under the control of the aliens.”

    “It doesn’t look like he’s under the control of anyone,” said another.

    “Traitor!” yelled a fourth.

    He raised his hand for silence, but nothing changed. He yelled “Hey!” but nothing changed. Finally he yelled “Silence!” at the top of his lungs. The gun tracked back and forth across the front of the group, and silence actually fell. Tad thought it would take some time to get used to the idea of weapons with initiative. That left him with another question: Why would machines intelligent enough to have initiative simply travel about serving human masters, masters who were apparently less capable than they were?

    He almost missed the opportunity presented by the silence by letting his mind wander. “I have a solution to your problem and mine. Any of you who want to are free to go. I know that the aliens will simply let you walk through them. You can hike to the nearest good landing area and then call for help on your personal communicators which will be returned to you.”

    Tad had no idea why, but he took a step back. He thought the prisoners would be delighted and leave immediately, but instead a vigorous and almost violent argument broke out. There were three general groups. One group thought the best thing to do was to go back right away if the aliens would let them. Another thought that if they did that, there was no way they wouldn’t be considered traitors. This second group thought that the first group would get executed if they weren’t just gunned down where they stood when they called for pickup. The third group left Tad stunned. Out of the 56 surviving prisoners, it looked like about a dozen thought the best thing to do was to join up with Tad.

    When their leader, a young Lieutenant in the Planetary Assault Forces, expressed that idea, actually fighting broke out. A little more yelling and some action from the gun and the dozen were separated from the rest. That still didn’t settle the issue for the other two groups.

    In the end, 25 troops chose to leave. Just as Tad had predicted, the aliens simply parted and allowed them to leave.

    After they had left, Tad said, “Well, what do I do with the rest of you?”

    The young lieutenant stepped forward. “I’m Lieutenant Sam Walad. I’d suggest you let me join you. I think you could use some help.”

    “I suppose I could. Give me a minute.”

    He stepped back over to the gun and asked it to link him to the shuttle. He wasn’t sure he was right, but he still felt that the shuttle had the better AI.

    “Is there a way to tell who’s sincere and who’s not?” he asked.

    “There is.”

    “And?”

    “I’m analyzing the record right now.” There was a pause. “It would be safe to accept the Lieutenant’s word,” the shuttle stated.

    He walked back over and held out his hand, but the Lieutenant offered him a salute. He returned it. “Well, Lieutenant,” he said. “I guess you’d better figure out something to do with the remaining prisoners since they won’t leave.”

    “I think they’re making the better choice. I don’t think the others stand a chance.”

    “What do you think is going to happen?”

    “Oh, they won’t be gunned down where they stand. They’ll be hung for a system-wide audience.”

    It was a very silent group that watched the images the shuttle relayed about a day later. The Lieutenant had indeed been right. And while those that had not yet joined Tad’s group didn’t come over, they ceased to present a problem.

    [Previous episode: A Disorienting Morning] [Next episode: An Actual Battle]